Awards
 
Print

Outstanding Publications Competition for 2016

Important Links for the 2016 Outstanding Publications Competition:

The purpose of the competitions is to recognize, honor, and share exceptional work that increases our understanding and contributes to the practice of applied research, evaluation, assessment, and accountability in our nation’s school systems. While many of us are engaged in similar work within similar settings, this competition provides an opportunity to learn from the diverse methods, applications, and approaches we use.

Excellence will be recognized in each of 5 entry categories listed in the table below.  
Use the links listed in the 3rd column to access the criteria that will be used to evaluate submissions in each category.

We depend on our members to review submissions. We are currently recruiting members to serve as reviewers for the 2015-2016 competition. The work will involve reviewing between 1 and 5 submissions during January and February 2016. If you are interested in being a reviewer, please indicate your interest by completing the following brief survey:

Category
Number

Category
Name

Link to
Rating Forms

Review Committee Chair

1

Applied Research:
Advances in Methodology
Applied Research Reports

Category 1a: Advances

Category 1b: Reports

1a: Linda Reddy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

1b: Elaine Allensworth, University of Chicago

2

Program Evaluation

Category 2

Georgia Hughes-Webb, West Virginia Department of Education

3

Assessment/Accountability

Category 3

Faith Connolly, Johns Hopkins University

4

Outstanding Dissertation

Category 4

Jennifer Whitson, Alexandria City Public Schools

5

Communicating research,
accountability, evaluation
and/or assessment to lay
audiences

Category 5

Nancy Katims, Katims Consulting


Requirements for Submission
 

Individuals and organizations are able and encouraged to submit more than one entry up to a maximum of five per person, agency, institution, or school district.  The same publication may not be entered into more than one category.  Entries for submission must have been produced or published between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015 and not submitted for last year's competition. The deadline for submissions is January 15, 2016.  The submission of work specifically developed and marketed as a commercial product will not be accepted.   

What to include in your submission:

  • Category 1 or 2: Report
  • Category 3:  Report or essay
  • Category 4:  Whole dissertation will not be reviewed. Please see guidelines for dissertation submission below.
  • Category 5:   Presentation materials or report
  • ALL categories:  Submission form
  • Additional materials may be submitted, as needed      

For the complete description of the competition, its requirements, and rules for submission please see the 2015 Outstanding Publications overview.

Additional Information Regarding Submissions for Outstanding Dissertation

Graduate Students:

To be eligible for this award, dissertations must have been written between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015.
 
The Award:  Division H recognizes up to three outstanding dissertations, depending on the quality of submissions. The top entry receives $1000.
 
Focus: Dissertations/theses must be developed and approved by a graduate school program and must specifically address a study in applied research, evaluation, assessment, or accountability within a school setting. Each entry must include a 10-15 page summary of the study.  The rating form for this category will guide you as to what your summary should include.  Additionally, each entry must be accompanied by a 1-2 page transmittal letter from a committee member indicating the attributes, which the advisor believes are most noteworthy in recommending the paper for this honor.

We strongly encourage submissions in this category. In addition to the fact that this category offers a monetary reward, in the past, competition has been much higher in the other publication categories. By making this submission, you are giving AERA Division H permission to distribute a copy of your publication on the division website.

Submission of Entries 

Stacey Merola and Rachel Durham will be coordinating the work of the Outstanding Publication Competition Committee.  You will need to submit an electronic copy of your submission, any supporting material, and the submission form to Stacey and Rachel at [email protected].  

Electronic copies should include the following information:

  • 2016 OPC Submission form in MS Word format. Save the file using this naming convention: OPC Cat X Submitter Name.doc; such as: OPC Cat 1 Jane Doe.doc.  Submit it as a WORD document.  Do not scan it.
  • Electronic copies of all documents (reports, essays, brochures, etc.) in MS Word or PDF format.  (For dissertations, include the 10-15 page summary instead of the entire dissertation.)
  • Electronic copy of PowerPoint 
  • If applicable, include additional special material noted within the category requirements in MS Word or PDF format.
  • For the Dissertation/Thesis category also include a 1-2 page transmittal letter from a committee advisor or member in MS Word or PDF format
  • For versions in media format send a link, if the material is available on the internet.  If not, contact Dale at [email protected] to determine how to effectively post the materials.

By making this submission, you are giving AERA Division H permission to post a copy of your submission on the Division H website.  No more than five submissions may be made by a single person, agency, institution, or school district.

It is VERY important to include the name of a contact person.  All materials are to be emailed on or before Friday, January 15, 2016 and sent directly to the Division H Outstanding Publication Competition Committee Chairperson, Stacey Merola, as detailed above.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Stacey at (703) 447-7883 or Rachel at (410) 516-4936 or by e­mail at [email protected]


Call for Reviewers

Each year Division H conducts an Outstanding Publications competition where we use the peer review process to recognize

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2016OutstandingPubReviewer



WINNERS OF THE OUTSTANDING PUBLICATION COMPETITION: 2015​

 

Category

Author(s)

Title (links forthcoming)



Category 1a:
Applied Research, Advances in Methodology

 

Linda A. Reddy
Gregory A. Fabiano
Christopher Dudek
Louis Hsu

 Predictive Validity of the Classroom Strategies Scale- Observer Form on Statewide Testing Scores: An Initial Investigation
Category 1b:
Applied Research, Reports

Elaine Allensworth
Julia A. Gwynne
Paul Moore
Marisa de la Torre

Looking Forward to High School and College: Middle Grade Indicators of Readiness in Chicago Public Schools

Category 2:
Program Research

 

Georgia Hughes-Webb
Karen L. Bradley
Hsiang-Yeh Ho
Jessica N. Jacovidis
Justin T. Lane
Kevin C. Knoster

West Virginia GEAR UP (Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs) Year 6 Evaluation: Overall Evaluation Summary from 2008-2014

Category 3:
Assessment and Accountability in Schools

 

Rachel E. Durham
Anne Bettencourt
Faith Connolly

Measuring School Climate Using Existing Data Tools on Climate and Effectiveness to Inform School Organizational Health

Category 4:
Outstanding Dissertation

First Place Winner:
Jennifer Leigh Whitson

The Relationship between High School Exit Policies, Student Transfers, and Attainment

Second Place Winner:
Anthony D. Fina

Growth and College Readiness of Iowa Students: A Longitudinal Study Linking Growth to College Outcomes

Category 5:

Communicating to Lay Audiences

Nancy Katims

Classroom Assessment Toolkit: Techniques that Enhance Student Learning with Links to Danielson Framework


WINNERS OF THE OUTSTANDING PUBLICATION COMPETITION: 2014​

 Category

Author(s)

Title  (links forthcoming)

Category 1: 
Applied Research

Karen M Cornetto

Raymond Gross

AISD Pilot Teacher Appraisal System Update: Results of the 2012-2013 Student Response Survey

Category 2:
Program Research

(
tie for 1st place)

Virginia Snodgrass Rangel

Elizabeth Bell

Carlos Monroy

Reid Whitaker

Final STEMscopes Report to ISD: Years 1 and 2

Tara Donahue

Hsiang-Yeh Ho

Melanie Fryman

Zachary Stone

Making Time for What Matters Most i3 Development Project: Year 3 Evaluation Report

Category 3: 
Assessment and Accountability in Schools

Joni M. Lakin

John W. Young

Evaluating Growth for ELL Students: Implications for Accountability Policies

Category 4:
Outstanding Dissertation

First Place Winner:
Kathleen Gallagher

Performance Assessment for Quality Teaching; Three Critical Variables for Measuring and Improving Teaching and Learning

Second Place Winner:
Matt Kraft

Essays on Improving the Quality of Education in K-12 Urban Public Schools

Category 5:

Communicating to Lay Audiences

Christopher R. Gareis

Leslie W. Grant

Assessment Literacy for Common Assessments: Professional Development Initiative

 


WINNERS OF THE OUTSTANDING PUBLICATION COMPETITION: 2013

 Category

Author(s)

Title & Link

Category 1:  Outstanding Dissertation

1st Place Winner: Rachel Boren

2nd Place Winner:
Valerie Sullivan

Examining Student Engagement and Self-Efficacy in a Second-Grade Mathematics Problem-Based Learning Unit--2 links:
Link 1Link 2

Student Achievement as an Indicator of Teacher Effectiveness: A Teacher Evaluation Model

Category 2:
Advances in Methodology

Nianbo Dong
Rebecca Maynard

PowerUp!: A tool for calculating MDES and MRSS for experimental and quasi-experimental design studies

Category 3:  Program Evaluation

Vanessa Coca
David Johnson
Thomas Kelley-Kemple
Melissa Roderick
Eliza Moeller
Nicole Williams
Kafi Morangne-Patterson

Working to My Potential: The Postsecondary Experiences of CPS Students in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme

Category 4:  Planning, Policy and/or Management Research

Faith Connolly
Linda S. Olson

Early Elementary Performance and Attendance in Baltimore City Schools’ Pre-Kindergarten and Kindergarten

Category 5:  Instructional Research or Alternative Reporting Methods 

Shana Shaw
Jeffrey C. Wayman

Third-Year Results from an Efficacy Study of the Acuity Data System

Category 6:  Assessment Training or Statistical Summary Report

Sonya Stevens
Bradley McMillan

EVAAS Reporting Training Module
Note: Way to link under investigation

 

 
Designed by Weber-Shandwick   Powered by eNOAH